A psychopathic perspective on psychopaths?
Jon Ronson, author of “the Psychopath Test” went to visit a mental institution to interview a patient, Tony, who was diagnosed a psychopath. Tony told him he had tried to escape from being convicted by acting like he was mad. After he got a taste of the alternative effect, he claimed he was perfectly sane and confessed his plan.
Jon continued his research and found out what kind of personality traits were related to this condition and started to analyze his surroundings, and even himself. Eventually, he comes to terms with his belief that most people have some of the traits that signify a psychopath.
I think it’s an occupational hazard that everyone who starts researching or working with the field of psychoanalysis might diagnose themselves, be it correct or incorrect. On the other hand, it is terribly interesting to find out how the mind works and how it affects everything and everyone around us.
The tests that were used to indicate and cure insanity are of an equally questionable nature as it’s subject’s behavior. Long term lsd trips and an alternative take on shock therapy seem a bit unstable or sought after. The last did work, but was banned for its nature was probably in conflict with a law.
Psychology never leaves me with statements, it leaves me with questions. What is sanity? Is it wrong to be insane, and should it be treated? And who or what can really decide who goes to a mental institution?